Studies have failed to yield definitive evidence for the existence and/or role of well-defined chaotic attractors in real brain systems. Tsuda's transients stabilized on unstable manifolds of unstable fixed points using mechanisms similar to Ott's algorithmic “control of chaos” are demonstrable. Grebogi's order in preserving “strange nonchaotic” attractor with fractal dimension but Lyapounov is suggested for neural network tasks dependent on sequence.

There is great skepticism about the admittance of expert normative ethics testimony into evidence. However, a practical analysis of the way ethics testimony has been used in courts of law reveals that the skeptical position is itself based on assumptions that are controversial. We argue for an alternative way to understand such expert testimony. This alternative understanding is based on the practice of clinical ethics.

This article is an attempt to clarify a confusion in the brain death literature between logical sufficiency/necessity and natural sufficiency/necessity. We focus on arguments that draw conclusions regarding empirical matters of fact from conceptual or ontological definitions. Specifically, we critically analyze arguments by Tom Tomlinson and Michael B. Green and Daniel Wikler. which, respectively, confuse logical and natural sufficiency and logical and natural necessity. Our own conclusion is that it is especially important in discussing the brain death issue to observe (...) the distinction between logical and natural sufficiency/necessity in a strict fashion. (shrink)

Cytokinesis in animal cells is accomplished by the active constriction of the equatorial regions of a cell by an actomyosin‐containing contractile ring. The mitotic apparatus specifies the position and orientation of the furrow such that the mitotic spindle is always bisected. Global cortical contractions occur in the cortex of a cell prior to cytokinesis that are independent of the presence of the mitotic apparatus. It was proposed some years ago that the asters of the mitotic apparatus could act to relax (...) the preformed cortical tension in their vicinity. This would produce a differential in tension between the equatorial regions and the adjacent regions of the cortex so that the equatorial regions would contract, forming a cleavage furrow. It can be shown that, as it stands, this theory cannot explain cleavage. However, if cortical contractile elements are assumed to be laterally mobile in the plane of the cortex, then the astral relaxation theory can account for many of the aspects of cleavage, including the formation of the contractile ring. Similar schemes may account for the behaviour of the lamellapodia of motile cells. (shrink)